Yes, of course. We definitely need to see some code here before it gets
officially "slated" for 1.7. I just know that efforts are being put
towards it, so I wanted to list it.
Christopher wrote:
Would replacing cloudtrace be part of1.7? I'm not sure about that. I'd
like to see where that's headed before we decide on that. Personally, I'd
prefer Zipkin, since htrace is basically a copy of
cloudtrace/accumulo-trace, and it has some of the same issues (millis time,
for instance, instead of relative nanos, which is independent of the system
clock and actually intended for time spans).
