On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > If I understand the rest of John's concern correctly, the risk of keeping > > around the old 1.x API having an impact on the form of the new 2.x API is > > largely tied to involvement in the RPC layer. > > > > > I'd expect the RPC layer (wire compatibility) to follow the same rules as > our public API, if we adopted semver. > > Please keep discussion about what our actual compatibility promises will be in the DISCUSS thread on compatibility. -- Sean
