I noticed some of the issues bumped to 1.6.3 were marked "Patch Available". Probably a good idea to review those and merge them in to 1.6.2 if they are ready.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > There are 8 blockers listed for 1.6.2 [1]. Only 1 is currently marked "In > Progress", 4 are unassigned, and 2 are documentations for the user manual, > and 1 is documentation for the release notes. > > Does anybody have specific items to add to the release notes? > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-1&jql=resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6.2%20and%20project%20%3D%20ACCUMULO > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Have you started tracking a CHANGES list yet (do we need to update >> anything added back in 1.6.2)? >> >> I did start a CHANGES file in the 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT branch. I figure after >> the >> tickets settle down I'll just create a new one. >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > I triage'd some of the issues, deferring to 1.7 if they were marked >> with a >> > fixVersion of 1.5.x or 1.6.x. I left documentation issues alone, as >> well as >> > tests-related improvements and tasks. I commented on a few which looked >> > like they were general internal improvements that weren't necessarily >> bugs. >> > Feel free to change them to bugs if I make an incorrect choice on those. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Thanks for starting this up, Corey. Have you started tracking a >> CHANGES >> > > list yet (do we need to update anything added back in 1.6.2)? >> > > >> > > Oof, good point re semver. Let's coordinate on triaging the tickets as >> > > there are quite a few. On IRC? I don't want multiple people to spend >> time >> > > looking at the same issues :) >> > > >> > > >> > > Christopher wrote: >> > > >> > >> Because we've agreed on Semver for release versioning, all the JIRAs >> > >> marked >> > >> for 1.6.x as something other than "Bug" (or maybe "Task", and "Test") >> > >> should probably have 1.6.x dropped from their fixVersion. >> > >> >> > >> They can/should get addressed in 1.7 and later. Those currently >> marked >> > for >> > >> 1.6.x need to be triage'd to determine if they've been labeled >> > correctly, >> > >> though. >> > >> >> > >> It's not that we can't improve internals in a patch release with >> Semver >> > >> (so >> > >> long as we don't alter the API)... but Semver helps focus changes to >> > patch >> > >> releases on things that fix buggy behavior. >> > >> >> > >> I'll do some triage later today (after some sleep) if others haven't >> > >> gotten >> > >> to it first. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II >> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Corey Nolet<cjno...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> Since we've been discussing cutting an rc0 for testing before we >> begin >> > >>> the >> > >>> formal release process. I've moved over all the non-blocker tickets >> > from >> > >>> 1.6.2 to 1.6.3 [1]. Many of the tickets that moved haven't been >> updated >> > >>> since the 1.6.1 release. If there are tickets you feel are necessary >> > for >> > >>> 1.6.2, feel free to move them back and mark them as a blocker [2]. >> I'd >> > >>> like >> > >>> to get an rc0 out very soon- possibly in the next couple of days. >> > >>> >> > >>> [1] >> > >>> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >> > >>> 3D%20ACCUMULO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6.3 >> > >>> >> > >>> [2] >> > >>> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >> > >>> 3D%20Accumulo%20and%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker% >> > >>> 20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.6.2%20and%20status%20%3D%20Open >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> > >
