----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#review69645 -----------------------------------------------------------
BUILD.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#comment114382> "manually experimenting [using a real instance]" Be more specific about what is meant by iterative experimentation. A user could work on a feature wholly using the normal build (compilation and unit tests). BUILD.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#comment114383> You can run Accumulo from that directory... after providing configuration? That's not automatic, is it? INSTALL.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#comment114387> Do we want upgrade information in an installation document? Does upgrades merit its own document? TESTING.md <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#comment114388> You can probably just scratch "with single threaded execution" - Josh Elser On Jan. 24, 2015, 1:06 a.m., kturner wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 24, 2015, 1:06 a.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-1515 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1515 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > Reorganized information in README and converted to markdown. > > At this point I like the INSTALL.md document, but do not really like the > content of the README.md ATM. Putting this up for review to get suggestions. > > See how the markdown looks on GH : > https://github.com/keith-turner/accumulo/tree/ACCUMULO-1515 > > > Diffs > ----- > > BUILD.md PRE-CREATION > INSTALL.md PRE-CREATION > README 4ebb078 > README.md PRE-CREATION > TESTING cf2afba > TESTING.md PRE-CREATION > assemble/src/main/assemblies/component.xml 3f18da3 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > kturner > >
