Given the stuff Keith found already, I'm -1, but I did take some time this RC to rerun some tests. I had one IT that failed on me from the source build which we can fix later -- things are looking good otherwise from my testing.

Thanks for working through this Corey, and Keith for finding bugs :)

Corey Nolet wrote:
   Devs,

     Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2

     Branch: 1.6.2-rc3
     SHA1: 3a6987470c1e5090a2ca159614a80f0fa50393bf
     Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/

     Source tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-src.tar.gz
     Binary tarball:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1021/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.2/accumulo-1.6.2-bin.tar.gz
     (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
given artifact.)

     Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS

     Over 1.6.1, we have 148 issues resolved:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=1.6.2-rc3

     Testing: All unit, integration and functional tests are passing.

     API compatibility report for 1.6.1 to 1.6.2:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.1_to_1.6.2/compat_report.html

     API backwards compatibility report for 1.6.2 to 1.6.1:
http://people.apache.org/~cjnolet/accumulo-1.6.2-rc3/compat_reports/accumulo/1.6.2_to_1.6.1/compat_report.html

     The vote will be open until Saturday, January 31st 12:00AM UTC (1/30
8:00PM ET, 1/30 5:00PM PT)

Reply via email to