----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30470/#review70454 -----------------------------------------------------------
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30470/#comment115650> A real message about what the code was tryign to do would be nice. For example, a table is dropped before we try to clear the cache. A good message could inform the user that it's probably OK to ignore. "Error clearing tablet locator cache, will continue" or something. server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30470/#comment115648> Might be worthwhile to add some jitter (maybe +/- a few minutes?). I'm not sure noticable it would be if all tservers dropped their caches at the same time and then started bashing on metadata and root. - Josh Elser On Jan. 30, 2015, 11:41 p.m., Eric Newton wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30470/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 30, 2015, 11:41 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > ACCUMULO-3549 > > > Diffs > ----- > > server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java > dfec999 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30470/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Eric Newton > >
