> On Jan. 27, 2015, 8:04 p.m., Christopher Tubbs wrote:
> > BUILD.md, lines 35-71
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/diff/5/?file=836993#file836993line35>
> >
> >     I'm not sure this section is even necessary here. It seems more 
> > appropriate to developer documentation on the website.
> 
> kturner wrote:
>     Its useful information, so it needs to go somewhere.  Build instructions 
> for 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 are very different.  Its nice when dealing with those 
> older versions to be able to look at their build instructions in the README.  
> I am not sure if version specific build instructions would be properly 
> maintained on the website.   IMO keeping these instructions versioned with 
> source is perferable to putting them on the website.  If we do keep these 
> instructions in source, I think BUILD.md is an ok place.
> 
> Christopher Tubbs wrote:
>     We have to consider the target audience. For build instructions for the 
> target audience of "consumers of the source tarball" (the official release), 
> I think the BUILD.md file makes sense. However, these instructions I've 
> highlighted do not target that audience (as stated explicitly in the 
> paragraph under the `Iterative Experimentation` header). I think these 
> instructions would confuse the primary target audience and should not be in 
> the BUILD.md file. It is useful, though, and we need to put it somewhere... I 
> just think that somewhere should be in a developer section on the website, 
> rather in the BUILD.md file targeted towards non-developers.
> 
> kturner wrote:
>     I dropped the instructions and moved contents of BUILD.md to README.md

Forgot to mention :  Had an offline discussion w/ Christopher about this.  One 
of the things we disccused was that complexity of these instructions vs `mvn 
package -Passemble; tar ...`   which basically does the same thing.


- kturner


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#review69865
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 31, 2015, 1:38 a.m., kturner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 31, 2015, 1:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-1515
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1515
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Reorganized information in README and converted to markdown.  
> 
> At this point I like the INSTALL.md document, but do not really like the 
> content of the README.md ATM.  Putting this up for review to get suggestions.
> 
> See how the markdown looks on GH : 
> https://github.com/keith-turner/accumulo/tree/ACCUMULO-1515
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   INSTALL.md PRE-CREATION 
>   NOTICE af212c2 
>   README 4ebb078 
>   README.md PRE-CREATION 
>   TESTING cf2afba 
>   TESTING.md PRE-CREATION 
>   assemble/src/main/assemblies/component.xml 3f18da3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kturner
> 
>

Reply via email to