Billie Rinaldi wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Christopher<ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> We do have the opportunity to move to a new improved API, if somebody were
> to put time into it. I guess that's true whether we put this in the public
> API officially or not.
Agreed. Even if we do create a new API, we can't change or drop the
existing API without breaking a lot of people's code. I feel like SKVI is
in a category of things that we treat as though they're in the public API,
so we might as well say it is.
+1 well put.
