Well, I wouldn't be surprised with some issues across a fedup (which is a way to do an upgrade between Fedora versions), but it should have been stable with normal/routine yum/dnf upgrades.
Were you using the Fedora-provided packages, or the BigTop ones? Or another set? On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:04 PM Corey Nolet <cjno...@gmail.com> wrote: > This may not be directly related but I've noticed Hadoop packages have been > not uninstalling/updating well the past year or so. The last couple times > I've run fedup, I've had to go back in manually and remove/update a bunch > of the Hadoop packages like Zookeeper and Parquet. > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > wrote: > > > That first post was intended for the Fedora developer list. Apologies for > > sending to the wrong list. > > > > If anybody is curious, it seems the Fedora community support around > Hadoop > > and Big Data is really dying... the packager for Flume and HTrace has > > abandoned their efforts to package for Fedora, and now it looks like the > > Hadoop package maintainer abandoned Hadoop, leaving Accumulo with > > unsatisfied dependencies. This is actually kind of a sad state of > affairs, > > because better packaging downstream could really help users, and expose > > more ways to improve the upstream products. > > > > As it stands, I think there is a disconnect between the upstream > > communities and the downstream packagers in the Big Data space which > > includes Accumulo. I would love to see more interest in better packaging > > for downstream users through these existing downstream packager > communities > > (Homebrew, Fedora, Debian, EPEL, Ubuntu, etc.), and I would love to see > > more volunteers come from these downstream communities to make > improvements > > upstream. > > > > As an upstream community, I believe the responsibility is for us to reach > > down first, rather than wait for them to come to us. I've tried to do > that > > within Fedora, with the hope that others would follow for the downstream > > communities they care about. Unfortunately, things haven't turned out how > > I'd have preferred, but I'm still hopeful. If there is anybody interested > > in downstream community packaging, let me know if I can help you get > > started. > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:28 PM Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Sorry, wrong list. > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM Christopher <ctubb...@fedoraproject.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my > > fault, > > >> for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned > > and/or > > >> retired? in Fedora. > > >> > > >> This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is > > >> dependent upon Hadoop. > > >> > > >> What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora these days? Are there packaging > > >> problems? Not enough support from upstream Apache community? Missing > > >> dependencies in Fedora? Not enough time to work on it? No interest > from > > >> users? > > >> > > >> Whatever the issue is... I'd like to help wherever I can... I'd like > to > > >> keep this stuff going. > > >> > > > > > >
