Thanks for the info, Mike!
Keith Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Mike Drob<[email protected]> wrote:
> Unit tests pass.
>
> ITs mostly pass. Have had transient failures on some, but have seen them
> all pass as well:
> DurabilityIT (ACCUMULO-4343)
> ChaoticBalancerIT (times out sometimes, completes other times, unable to
> consistently reproduce)
> AssignmentThreadsIT.testConcurrentAssignmentPerformance (was not
> performant enough, I assume this was a hardware contention issue)
>
> Installed on a cdh5.7.0 cluster and did some basic insert and query
> operations.
>
> Have not run CI, RW, or anything for replication tests yet. I'm about 50/50
> on having time to do that this week, so if anybody else wants to volunteer,
>
I started CI w/o agitationrunning on 9 EC2 nodesyesterday. I will
probably start a run w/ agitation.
Thanks, Keith. I wouldn't be able to get anything together until
Thursday night at best. If you want to extend the VOTE over the weekend,
I'll try to run stuff too, but I don't think it's necessary if Keith is
on the ball.
> that would be swell. I know we've discussed a lower test bar for bugfix
> releases in the past, so maybe we don't strictly need them? (A vote thread
> is probably not the best place to discuss this, though).
>
I agree. I think these decisions can be made per release. If someone
feels inadequate testing was done for a release they can vote accordingly
and explain the vote.
Ditto. I was asking just to understand what you had done so far, not to
turn around and tell you that you didn't do enough :)
A quick CI and/or RW is always nice, but definitely not the 1 and 3 day
runs that we do for the "major" (in our old terms, "minor" in terms of
semver) releases.
