Ah, my mistake. I thought it was 2.7 and later. Well, then I guess the question is whether we should bump to 2.8, then. I'm not a fan of the shim layer. I'd rather provide support for downstream packagers trying to backport for HTrace3, if anybody ends up requiring that, than provide a shim to preserve use of the older HTrace.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:30 PM Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm in favor of bumping our Hadoop version to 2.7. We are already on the > same htrace version as Hadoop 2.7. (The discussion in ACCUMULO-4171 is > relevant to Hadoop 2.8 and later.) > > Billie > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thinking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4171, I'm > of > > the opinion that we should probably bump our Hadoop version to 2.7 and > > HTrace version to what Hadoop is using, to keep them in sync. > > > > Does anybody disagree? > > >
