In many cases , I would imagine faster is better . On Sat, Aug 13, 2016, 10:56 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> What's the motivation for changing it? > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:47 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Any reason we don't want to do this? Last rule-of-thumb I heard was that > > snappy is often close enough in compression to GZ but quite a bit faster > > (I don't remember exactly how much). > > > > - Josh > > >
