Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/194#discussion_r93819758
--- Diff: assemble/src/main/assemblies/component.xml ---
@@ -40,15 +40,48 @@
<include>org.apache.commons:commons-math3</include>
<include>org.apache.commons:commons-vfs2</include>
<include>org.apache.thrift:libthrift</include>
+ <include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-continuation</include>
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-http</include>
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-io</include>
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security</include>
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server</include>
+ <!-- jetty-servlet only needed by old monitor -->
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-servlet</include>
<include>org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-util</include>
<include>org.apache.htrace:htrace-core</include>
<include>org.slf4j:slf4j-api</include>
<include>org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12</include>
+ <!-- Jersey/Jackson-based webservice -->
--- End diff --
> Jersey brings in a lot of dependencies that will have to be distributed
with Accumulo
This is a good point and one that I had punted on originally. I agree with
Jersey being ideal as the reference implementation for jax-rs; however,
depending on the size of what we actually need to include to make it work, I
could be swayed. I'm not sure what this actually looks like transitively.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
