Thanks Ed, this all sounds good. Does anyone need a 1.8.2 release? On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:43 AM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> I am +1 on the dates you proposed and i can run test on EC2 for both > releases. I would like to see 1.9.0 released earlier than you > suggested. > > As for the performance fixes I think I am out of cycles to continue > that work in the short term, so I probably will not be making any more > fixes related to performance before 1.7.4 and 1.9.0. Hopefully I can > revisit performance testing in a few months. > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Ed Coleman <d...@etcoleman.com> wrote: > > I'd like to propose that we start the release process for 1.7.4 and then > > 1.9.0. I'm willing to be the release manager for both if that would > > facilitate things. > > > > > > > > As a strawman - I propose: > > > > > > > > March 1st - we start the formal release process of 1.7.4, with a goal > that > > it would be complete and released around March 15th. This would be the > last > > planned release of the 1.7.x line. > > > > March 19th we start the formal release process of 1.9.0. > > > > > > > > My real objective is to get a release of 1.9.0 that would be mostly > > equivalent to what would have been an 1.8.2, with the API changes for > > configuration to support Hadop-3. There seems to be some fixes in 1.8.1 > that > > I'd like to see released and Keith Turner seems to be making some > > substantial fixes to performance issues that I'd hope to be able to take > > advantage of - however, I would like to have a bound to help limit > upgrade > > risks. > > > > > > > > The dates are just a starting point for discussion - if Keith has > additional > > fixes that we'd like to get in, but needs additional time that's fine > with > > me, I'm really just pushing for sooner rather than later. > > > > > > > > Ed Coleman > > > > > > >
