One roadmap item which has been discussed is 1.9.0. If a "what's coming" element is needed, that could be mentioned, even if nothing else is known at this time.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4/9/18 12:40 PM, Michael Wall wrote: > > Thanks for reading this Josh. > > > > 1 - In my first draft I had no information about Tony but I felt like > that > > was going to prompt questions. I agree contributor is more relevant but > he > > is not listed on the people page. Do we think that matters? > > I don't think that matters. The contributors page is code-contributors, > but the board certainly knows that such lists are not all-encompassing. > > > 2 - What were you thinking on the "what's next"? Maybe it is time for us > > to really define a roadmap, not sure there is time before this is due on > > Wed though. > > My omission of specifics here was intentional ;) I don't have the time > to devote meaningful cycles here, but I would agree with you that > something should probably be documented. If nothing else, acknowledging > that a roadmap is necessary is a sufficient improvement! >
