Thanks for the summary Christopher, and thanks for pushing the release
through.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:02 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:21 PM Michael Wall <mjw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Congrats.  Don't forget to update the release notes with the testing
> > information to include versions.  I didn't realize that 1.9 would work
> with
> > Hadoop 3 but I see it in the parent pom as a profile.  Also, did anything
> > change as result of Sean and Mike's comments?
> >
> >
> Regarding Hadoop 3 and testing,
>
> Accumulo 1.9.0 will, in theory, work with Hadoop 3, because of the work
> Josh did to check during development, and to modify the build... but using
> it with Hadoop 3 may require building from source with the Hadoop 3
> profile, or at least, require users to perform some packaging/integration
> steps to set up the class path for their deployments with Hadoop 3. I don't
> know if anybody has done any tests other than build tests with the profile
> active. Also, some Hadoop 3 features may or may not be available, due to
> lack of Accumulo ability to configure them (per-table HDFS erasure encoding
> settings, for example, as an alternative to replication factor). In short,
> user mileage may vary, but at least the option is there to try (because the
> code compiles and the basic build tests pass).
>
> Regarding Sean and Mike's comments:
>
> In response to Sean and Mike's comments, I copied the tarballs to the SVN
> dist/dev area, along with their SHA512 sums, but no votes were changed as a
> result. I saw no indication in the discussion that anybody other than
> myself examined those files to ensure they met expectations. I also
> proposed a change in the thread to the release process as a result of Sean
> and Mike's comments (specifically, to include the SHA512 for the tarballs,
> directly in future vote threads), but have not heard a response back on
> that proposal. I will likely proceed with a change to the build.sh script
> to incorporate that proposal in a future pull request, unless somebody has
> a better proposal before then.
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:59 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > This vote passes with: 6*(+1) + 1*(-0) + 1*(-1)
> > >
> > > +1: edcoleman, mwalch, jmark99, ctubbsii, kturner, mmiller
> > > -0: mdrob
> > > -1: busbey
> > >
> > > Thanks for the votes all, I'll start working on the post-vote steps
> next.
> > > It looks like folks are still making updates to the release notes.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:47 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > * Verified SVN staging area (dist/dev/accumulo/1.9.0-rc1) tarballs
> > match
> > > > Nexus staging area (artifacts and GPG sigs) and SHA512s there are
> > > correct.
> > > > * Ran mvn verify -DskipTests with both Hadoop 2 and Hadoop 3
> > > > * Ran all ITs successfully with Hadoop 2
> > > > * GPG signatures match release tarball artifacts (and other Maven
> > > > artifacts)
> > > > * Maven repo is consistent (all md5, sha1 sigs match their Maven
> > > artifacts)
> > > > * All jars have corresponding javadoc and source jars.
> > > > * Contents of binary tarball lib directory match Maven jars
> > > > * Source tarball matches git commit
> > > > * Jar manifest indicates build from correct git commit
> > > > * Jars are sealed
> > > > * Using 1.9.0 jars, successfully built Apache Fluo (with ITs)|
> > > > * Also attempted to build Hive... which works, but some Accumulo
> tests
> > > > fail because of the use of "." in iterator names, which is broken,
> and
> > > > explicitly checked for as of ACCUMULO-3389
> > > > * Also attempted to build geowave, but that failed because geowave
> > > appears
> > > > to extensively make use of non-public API from Accumulo, so I gave
> up.
> > > >
> > > > I checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files also, and they look good,
> except
> > > > for the fact that they still say 2017, instead of 2018. I can't
> > believe I
> > > > forgot to check this a second time, after this same thing happened
> for
> > > > 1.7.4. In any case, I don't think it's worth holding up the release,
> > > given
> > > > that there do not seem to be any other serious issues with the
> > artifacts.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:07 AM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >>  * Successfully built Fluo against RC
> > > >>  * Ran continuous ingest for 24hrs on 9 node cluster using RC.
> > > >> Verified successfully.  Table had 32.3 billion entries after test.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> > Accumulo Developers,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.9.0.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Git Commit:
> > > >> >     bca516000bdb54b1e5582f908e0a525634a120f7
> > > >> > Branch:
> > > >> >     1.9.0-rc1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using:
> > > >> >     git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.9.0' -s rel/1.9.0 \
> > > >> >     bca516000bdb54b1e5582f908e0a525634a120f7
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Staging repo:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1070
> > > >> > Source (official release artifact):
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1070/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.9.0/accumulo-1.9.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >> > Binary:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1070/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.9.0/accumulo-1.9.0-bin.tar.gz
> > > >> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5", or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> > for
> > > a
> > > >> > given artifact.)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > > >> >     mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Signing keys are available at
> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > >> > (Expected fingerprint: 8CC4F8A2B29C2B040F2B835D6F0CDAE700B6899D)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
> > > >> > https://accumulo.apache.org/release/accumulo-1.9.0/
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please vote one of:
> > > >> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > > >> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> > against...
> > > >> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > > >> > ... these artifacts as the 1.9.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This vote will remain open until at least Sun Apr 15 22:30:00 UTC
> > 2018
> > > >> > (Sun Apr 15 18:30:00 EDT 2018 / Sun Apr 15 15:30:00 PDT 2018).
> > > >> > Voting continues until the release manager sends an email closing
> > the
> > > >> vote.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > > >> >     wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1070/
> > > >> >     # note the trailing slash is needed
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to