sounds like a good DISCUSS thread for 2.0? On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:43 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems like commons-vfs2 is just a pile of crap. > > It's been known to have bugs for years and we've seen zero progress from > them on making them better. > > IMO, rip the whole damn thing out. > > On 10/24/18 12:42 PM, Matthew Peterson wrote: > > Hello Accumulo, > > > > Summary: commons-vfs2 version 2.2 seems to have problems and it may be > > worth rolling back to version 2.1 of commons-vfs2. > > > > My project upgraded a system from Accumulo 1.8.1 to 1.9.2. Immediately > > after switching vfs contexts we saw problems. The tservers would error in > > iterators about missing classes that were clearly on the classpath. The > > problems were persistent until we replaced the commons-vfs2.jar with > > version 2.1 (Accumulo 1.9.2 uses version 2.2). Until we rolled vfs back, > > we received errors particularly with Spring code trying to access various > > classes and files within the jars. It looks like in 2.2, commons-vfs > > implemented a doDetach method which closed the zip files. We suspect that > > code is the problem but haven't tested that theory. > > > > I suspect that most users don't use this feature. > > > > Thanks! > > Matt > >
-- busbey
