I'd say either 800, 819 or 854 or all of the above. Basically any that Keith worked on haha. Maybe he can chose his favorite if you just want one... Keith? https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/854 https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/819 https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/800
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:29 AM Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mike, > > Perhaps something from > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+label%3Av1.9.3 > ? Any of those you were thinking? > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:54 AM Mike Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There have been a few critical fixes in 1.9 and 2.0, both warranting > > releases soon. You could mention something like that in the activity. > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:49 AM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1/7/19 11:26 AM, Michael Wall wrote: > > > > Hi Josh, thanks for reviewing. > > > > > > > > The "PMC Changes" was copied directly from the reporter.apache.org > > > > template. The "Committer base changes" was in response to feedback > > from > > > > the board several reports ago asking if all committers were PMC > > > members. I > > > > could say something like "All Committers are also PMC members, see > the > > > PMC > > > > Changes section for details". Is that what you mean by more > explicit? > > > Or > > > > do you mean something else? > > > > > > I had initially thought just copy/paste'ing the text from the PMC > > > additions was good, but, on second thought, suggesting that readers > look > > > at the PMC additions section in the Committer additions section is just > > > as good. > > > > > > Thanks for the careful attention, Mike! > > > > > >
