+1 for starting 2.0 release process. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:57 AM Owens, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for starting 2.0 release process. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Coleman <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 7:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: 2.0.0 home stretch > > +1 for starting the release process once the open issues identified by > Christopher are resolved. > > I was able to build, run verify and -Psunny with 2.0 as of the commits > through Sat (commit 2d9f12ee873c1007438df25a095a4ca3a62b7967) with openjdk > 1.8.0_212. All tests and all ITs in -Psunny passed without any issues. > There is some additional testing I'd like to perform concerning blocking > for available tservers - but I know of no issues at this time. > > Ed Coleman > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2019 6:07 PM > To: accumulo-dev <[email protected]> > Subject: 2.0.0 home stretch > > Devs, > > I just spent quite a bit of my weekend getting the 2.0 branch to build > without failures using either JDK 8 or JDK 11, to make it easier for folks > to build and run the 2.0 release candidates. > (Lots of tiny errors, like javadocs, broken assumptions about garbage > collection in our test code, broken classloader hierarchy assumptions, and > spotbugs issues). > > It was quite a bit of work, but I am happy to say that I've finally got > 2.0 building well enough to test with on either JDK. > > I would like to get started doing release candidates for 2.0.0. I think > the only thing holding things up now is: > > * Two open pull requests against the 2.0 branch, > * One potential bug to watch out for in testing (or close, if it can't be > reproduced), and > * (Most importantly) enthusiasm for release from the community (it's been > pretty quiet in response to my previous TEST RC, so I don't know where > people are at in terms of their readiness for voting on a real release > candidate). > > The 2.0.0 project board can be seen here if you want to help with one of > the remaining tasks, or if you identify any new things that needs done for > 2.0.0: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/projects/9 > Otherwise, feel free to comment here to indicate your readiness for > releasing 2.0.0. > > Cheers, > > Christopher > >
