config -t accumulo.metadata -f table.custom.volume.preferred

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:32 PM Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:

> There's a TODO in the code for that issue, too. The issue just needs
> somebody to work on it. It might be a simple matter of ensuring the
> VolumeChooserEnvironment created in the init code has an appropriate
> service environment object which contains the site configuration (but
> not the system config from zookeeper).
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:17 PM Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be a good idea to have the PreferredVolumeChooser select
> > volumes during init. Looks like there is already an issue open for this:
> > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1373
> >
> > I imagine you could move a table to a different volume by changing the
> > preferred volume configuration and then compacting the table. But as
> Keith
> > mentions in the issue, it would be easier if this weren't necessary.
> >
> > Billie
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 3:45 PM karthick rn <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When provisioning multiple volumes, for ex. HDFS & Azure Data Lake
> storage,
> > > it would be good to choose which volume we want the system tables like
> > > metadata, root, replication tables to be created. Currently, Accumulo
> > > randomly creates these tables on multiple volumes and the only way to
> > > control this is to run Accumulo init on 1st volume so all system
> tables get
> > > created on this volume and then add the other volumes.
> > >
> > > I have also tried running 'config -t accumulo.metadata -s
> > > table.custom.volume.preferred=hdfs://accucluster/accumulo' in an
> attempt to
> > > move the metadata table to a preferred volume, in this case HDFS, but I
> > > don’t see metadata table under HDFS. Also, ‘config -f
> > > table.custom.volume.preferred’ does not show anything!
> > > In short, I was wondering if there is any provision to "move" these
> system
> > > tables across volumes, or is that a non-goal by design?
> > >
> > > Many thanks
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Karthick
> > >
>

Reply via email to