This looks great.  Your project activity section is packed with useful
information and really short.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:51 PM Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The Apache Accumulo PMC decided to draft its quarterly board
> reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due
> tomorrow, Wednesday, Jan 8, 1 week before the board meeting on
> Wednesday, Jan 15. Please let me know if you have any feedback.
>
> Some more detailed metrics are at
> https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/statistics?accumulo,
> which appears to require a committer login.
>
> Mike
>
> ----
> [REPORT] Accumulo - Jan 2020
>
> ## Description:
>
> The Apache Accumulo sorted, distributed key/value store is a robust,
> scalable,
> high performance data storage system that features cell-based access control
> and customizable server-side processing. It is based on Google's BigTable
> design and is built on top of Apache Hadoop, Zookeeper, and Thrift.
>
> ## Issues:
>
> The Oct report listed a discussion about a trademark issue at
> http://www.accumulodata.com
> [1]. We are still waiting for the owner to repoint to
> https://accumulo.apache.org.
>
>
> ## Membership Data:
>
> Apache Accumulo was founded 2012-03-20 (8 years ago)
> There are currently 36 committers and 36 PMC members in this project.
> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 1:1.
>
> Community changes, past quarter:
> - No new PMC members. Last addition was Holly Keebler on 2019-08-08.
> - No new committers. Last addition was Holly Keebler on 2019-08-09.
>
> ## Project Activity:
>
> - No new releases this quarter, although 1.10 is in discussion [2] and [3],
> which is the 1.9 line with the minimum JDK moved to 1.8.  The 1.10 releases
> will also be our first LTS release [4].
> - The monthly "Hack Day" continues in Columbia MD. There was nothing of note
> posted from the meetings in Oct[5] and Dec[6].  The Nov[7] meetup was
> mirrored on the west coast and some issues labeling for 'good first issue'
> was
> accomplished [8].
>
> ## Community Health:
>
> - Activity in the community was lower this quarter than last, but
> consistent
> prior quarters.  The uptick last quarter was most likely due the surge to
> release
> 2.0.
>
> [1]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/514d3cf9162e72f4aa13be1db5d6685999fc83755695308a529de4d6@%3Cprivate.accumulo.apache.org
> [2]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ee05bb430a28dfa5f6cab0eec18be26926e7404182102667ea14cc56%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [3]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/266d114a0638accba6b9dc3768474cf43d6b965149572cf07bcf4cdb%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [4]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43f051404bc5f15cde8f971ccbdc4cf7b017cc014affd914c357eaad%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [5]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/05b21f61ca4bd3fe2610984953990bca041dc9a7f74a3bd0f70c6f99%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [6]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/cc3c8b81ee1a0f946cef0b84c756f2a199a320c3f81e63054bfdb072%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [7]:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19dc06fa9f649adc3bb70ca6e6cbdf8c5f8d1525a57f17b6e6d315db%40%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
> [8]:
> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22

Reply via email to