It has been 72 hours, and no objection, so I've removed the 1.9 branch, and updated the two remaining PRs against it to base them on 1.10.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jeffrey Zeiberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:20 PM Jeffrey Manno <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:57 AM Adam Lerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 11:08 AM Ed Coleman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Christopher <[email protected]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 11:08 AM > > > > To: accumulo-dev <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: [LAZY][VOTE] Rename the 1.9 branch to 1.10 > > > > > > > > Hi Accumulo devs, > > > > > > > > I've heard from a few people that they are confused why we are > > developing > > > > in a 1.9 branch when we are working towards a 1.10 release. > > > > I had intended to wait until we actually release 1.10 to deal with the > > > > branch rename as part of the post-release process. However, I now think > > > > that it'd be better to clear up this confusion by just renaming the > > > branch > > > > now, so we can be done with it. > > > > > > > > I'll go ahead and create a 1.10 maintenance branch from 1.9 so we can > > > work > > > > out of that instead, and will update any open PRs against that branch. > > > > > > > > Unless there's an objection within 72 hours, I'll go ahead and delete > > the > > > > 1.9 branch after that. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Christopher > > > > > > > > > > > > >
