Is there a list of things in 1.10 that will no longer work in 2.0.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 08:59:58AM -0400, Christopher wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > To supplement what Mike said, it's possible some stuff that was > deprecated in 1.10 was dropped in 2.0. I don't have a comprehensive > list of what that might include, but anything marked as deprecated in > 1.10 is subject to removal in 2.0. If I recall, we did try to limit it > somewhat. It wouldn't really make sense to create a shim to restore > those APIs, though, because that would just reintroduce code we > explicitly dropped, which defeats the purpose of a major version bump. > In semantic versioning, the entire point of a major version bump is to > declare a break in the backwards compatibility of the public API. > > If you need the code that was dropped, you probably aren't ready to > move to 2.x. 1.10 is an LTM release, so that means we intend to keep > patching important bugs until a year after our next LTM (which hasn't > yet been released). So, if you need to stay on 1.10, you have plenty > of time to update your code to stop using deprecated APIs and avoid > non-public APIs. > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:10 AM Mike Miller <mmil...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > If the library was written using only the public API then it shouldn't be a > > problem. See https://accumulo.apache.org/api/ > > Accumulo follows SemVer to maintain compatibility of the public API between > > versions. There are a lot of changes between 1.10 and 2.0 but anything in > > the public API in 1.10 should still exist in 2.0, even if deprecated. > > If the library is calling internal methods or extending internal classes, > > then that is a different story. If it uses internals then I recommend > > refactoring to use the public API if possible. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Vincent Russell <vincent.russ...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am interested in using an accumulo query and storage library that was > > > written against accumulo version 1.10 and I am interested in using it with > > > accumulo 2.0. > > > > > > Is there a shim that exists that would allow the library to be used for > > > both versions that could be activated at compile time via a maven profile > > > or something? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vincent > > >
