Dave & Mark,

Running the sunny tests with the hadoop 3 profile resulted in no local
errors for me.
`mvn clean verify package -Dhadoop.profile=3 -Psunny`

So I checked my local maven repo and while I do have commons-configuration
1.6, the pom lists commons-beanutils-core:1.8.0 as a dependency.
commons-configuration-1.6.jar.sha1: 32cadde23955d7681b0d94a2715846d20b425235
commons-configuration-1.6.pom.sha1: 8ebce8a5a8c0f6ff837de6665aca8e2bd0d46ea5

Hadoop 3.0.3's pom does have commons-beanutils:1.9.3 listed for me as well.

I wiped my local maven repo and rebuilt this RC and there were no changes
to the commons-configuration or hadoop pom files.
Checking maven artifact paths, I only have the single 1.8.0 version of
commons-beanutils-core, but I have commons-beanutils jars for 1.7.0, and
1.9.4.

- Dan

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 1:21 PM Mark Owens <jmoapa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Running the hadoop3 profile, I also had an issue with the
> CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest as did Dave. I was running on CentOS7.
>
> [ERROR] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 7.559 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest
> [ERROR]
>
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs
>  Time elapsed: 2.527 s  <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanIntrospector
>         at
>
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanIntrospector
>         at
>
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 PM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From what I can tell:
> >
> > 1. commons-configuration:1.6 has a commons-beanutils:1.7.0 dependency
> > 2. hadoop-common:3.0.3 has a commons-beanutils:1.9.3 dependency,
> > hadoop-common:2.6.5 has no such dependency
> >
> > Hadoop 3.0.3 is failing because the commons-beanutils:1.9.3 dependency
> must
> > not be on the classpath for the test. I have no idea why this is failing
> on
> > my machine and not for others. I'm also seeing general slowness building
> > 1.10.3 on my machine, but not building other git branches.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 8:24 AM Dave Marion <dmario...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I built the source tarball using the hadoop3 profile again and
> > encountered
> > > the issue below. The version of hadoop (3.0.3) has not changed, so I
> > assume
> > > that this is related to a change in our dependencies.
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
> > > 3.856 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> > > org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest
> > > [ERROR]
> > >
> >
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs
> > >  Time elapsed: 1.186 s  <<< ERROR!
> > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > org/apache/commons/beanutils/BeanIntrospector
> > > at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> > > org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanIntrospector
> > > at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.accumulo.core.conf.CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.extractFromHdfs(CredentialProviderFactoryShimTest.java:185)
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 11:41 AM Jeffrey Manno <
> jeffreymann...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> I did run into a few flaky tests but none seem to warrant a stoppage
> to
> > >> this release candidate. Two common ones are SuspendTabletsIT and
> > >> DeleteTableDuringSplitIT.
> > >>
> > >> Other checks I did:
> > >>
> > >>    - Ran the entire test suite, along with sunny day tests.
> > >>    - Verified checksums.
> > >>    - Did some small ingest testing with agitation.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 9:18 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > >> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1 (binding), LGTM
> > >> >
> > >> > Some of the things I did for verification/testing locally:
> > >> >
> > >> > * Validated signatures and checksums
> > >> > * Verified license and notice files in archives
> > >> > * Verified source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
> > >> > * Built and ran all the sunny integration tests
> > >> > * Started up using Uno to make sure everything started correctly
> (also
> > >> ran
> > >> > a couple scans, etc)
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 4:23 PM Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Accumulo Developers,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo
> 1.10.3.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Git Commit:
> > >> > >     733863638d85d0109d217da7ea5f36f5e483e207
> > >> > > Branch:
> > >> > >     1.10.3-rc1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using:
> > >> > >     git tag -f -s -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.10.3' rel/1.10.3 \
> > >> > >     733863638d85d0109d217da7ea5f36f5e483e207
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Staging repo:
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100
> > >> > > Source (official release artifact):
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.3/accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz
> > >> > > Binary:
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.10.3/accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Append ".asc" to download the cryptographic signature for a given
> > >> > artifact.
> > >> > > (You can also append ".sha1" or ".md5" instead in order to verify
> > the
> > >> > > checksums
> > >> > > generated by Maven to verify the integrity of the Nexus repository
> > >> > > staging area.)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Signing keys are available at
> > >> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >> > > (Expected fingerprint: 8CC4F8A2B29C2B040F2B835D6F0CDAE700B6899D)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > In addition to the tarballs and their signatures, the following
> > >> checksum
> > >> > > files will be added to the dist/release SVN area after release:
> > >> > > accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > >> > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.3-src.tar.gz) =
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> 436707da7424ea1b7993355d70747068264276234a4772f9da3866a638ad7860a754436f34ab2108e54801cced67f00ca2cfe0f46dfb80f2d7609b7b7112045e
> > >> > > accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz.sha512 will contain:
> > >> > > SHA512 (accumulo-1.10.3-bin.tar.gz) =
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> 36e6795ad3720ba72fc9f4ddabf45f6d67cdc77658a181733fa2c47bfd3799f123b8840a79b538b8504a7b4bdc97fd0b52efab790395a5e022a897bc18405d0c
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Release notes (in progress) can be found at:
> > >> > > https://accumulo.staged.apache.org/release/accumulo-1.10.3
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Release testing instructions:
> > >> > > https://accumulo.apache.org/contributor/verifying-release
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please vote one of:
> > >> > > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > >> > > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> > against...
> > >> > > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > >> > > ... these artifacts as the 1.10.3 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This vote will remain open until at least Mon Apr 10 08:30:00 PM
> UTC
> > >> > 2023.
> > >> > > (Mon Apr 10 04:30:00 PM EDT 2023 / Mon Apr 10 01:30:00 PM PDT
> 2023)
> > >> > > Voting can continue after this deadline until the release manager
> > >> > > sends an email ending the vote.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > >> > >     wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH \
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1100/
> > >> > >     # note the trailing slash is needed
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to