Looks good.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:34 AM dev1 <d...@etcoleman.com> wrote:

> I updated the section that Mark pointed out.  It now reads (as pasted from
> the reported tool):
>
> Work continues on the evolution of the Accumulo processing model to support
> dynamic scaling and provide elasticity.  The goal for Accumulo is to move
> from
> a model where active table metatdata and table data management is hosted in
> active processes to a model that can dynamically scale server components
> on-demand to provide configurable latency and higher scalability. the
> community has not decided if the redesign will be a 3.1 or a 4.0 release.
>
> I also updated the community health section to read:
>
> ## Community Health:
> Overall community health is good and GitHub activity remains consistent.
>
> - Accumulo development centers on GitHub as reflected in the GitHub
> activity
>   (both pull requests and issues) compared to email list activity.
> Community
>    discussions also occur on the the-asf accumulo slack channel.
> - The increase in GitHub activity is due to robust development on the 2.1.1
>   and 2,1.2 (planned) releases and the work on providing dynamic scaling
> and
>   elasticity.
> - The large number of issues opened (133) vs closed (77) reflects issues
> being
>   created as work is identified as work on elasticity changes are
> identified.
>   Currently there are 71 open issues against the elasity project, compared
>   with 10 open and 2 in progress issues against the 2.1 branch and 2 open
> and
>   5 in progress issues against the 3.0 branch.
>
> I’d like to submit this later today (it is due by tomorrow)
>
> Ed Coleman
>
> From: dev1 <d...@etcoleman.com>
> Date: Friday, July 7, 2023 at 9:56 AM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Accumulo Quaterly Report - Due by 7/12
> Thanks – I’ll make that change.
>
> One section that I think could use more text is Community Health section.
> The ASF board is also interested in more than the technical details, but I
> struggled with providing anything meaningful.  For the recent quarter we
> have had a issues raised by a variety of users, but I did not know how to
> capture that. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
>
>
> From: Mark Owens <jmoapa...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, July 7, 2023 at 7:12 AM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Accumulo Quaterly Report - Due by 7/12
> Overall looks good to me,
>
> My only suggestion would be to modify the opening sentence in the paragraph
> prior to 'Community Health'. It seems incomplete to me, i.e.,  "Work on the
> evolution of the Accumulo processing model to support dynamic scaling and
> provide elasticity."
>
> A simple fix could be to add a verb into the sentence. Perhaps something
> like, i.e., "Work continues on the evolution of the Accumulo processing
> model to support dynamic scaling and provide elasticity." or "Work on the
> evolution of the Accumulo processing model to support dynamic scaling and
> provide elasticity is ongoing."
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 8:54 PM dev1 <d...@etcoleman.com> wrote:
>
> > The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on
> > the Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the July report  for
> review
> > / comments.
> >
> > The text below is copied from the reporting tool and may not reflect the
> > final formatting of the final report when submitted.
> >
> > Ed Coleman
> >
> > --- report tool text ---
> >
> > ## Description:
> > The mission of Apache Accumulo is the creation and maintenance of
> software
> > related to a robust, scalable, distributed key/value store with
> cell-based
> > access control and customizable server-side processing.
> >
> > ## Project Status:
> > Current project status: Ongoing with moderate activity.
> > Issues for the board: none.
> >
> > Accumulo is currently working two significant development efforts.
> > Improving
> > the performance and stability of the 2.1.x line and the evolution of the
> > processing model to support dynamic scaling and provide elasticity.
> >
> > ## Membership Data:
> > Apache Accumulo was founded 2012-03-21 (11 years ago)
> > There are currently 41 committers and 38 PMC members in this project.
> > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 6:5.
> >
> > Community changes, past quarter:
> > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Christopher L. Shannon on
> > 2022-09-27.
> > - No new committers. Last addition was Christopher L. Shannon on
> > 2022-09-27.
> >
> > ## Project Activity:
> >
> > Releases:
> > - accumulo-2.1.1 was released on 2023-06-19.
> > - accumulo-1.10.3 was released on 2023-04-13.  1.x is planned to be end
> of
> >   life on or around 2023-11-01, with an expected final release of any
> >   ready-to-ship bug fixes.
> >
> > The 2.1.1 release closes CVE-2023-34340. Accumulo 2.1.0 contains a defect
> > in
> > the user authentication process that may succeed when invalid credentials
> > are
> > provided. The CVE was reported on 2023-06-01 and was closed with the
> > release
> > on 2023-06-19.
> >
> > Activity on 2.1 has been very active with bug-fixes and performance
> > improvements that are being driven by increased community adoption of
> > 2.1.x as
> > 1.10.x approaches end of life. Accumulo is planning on a 2.1.2 release
> this
> > quarter that includes items that were slated for 2.1.1, but were bumped
> > because of the need for a quick release to resolve the CVE.
> >
> > A release of 3.0 is also expected this quarter. It is planned to be a
> > removal
> > of deprecated items as permitted by semver, but with minimal other
> changes.
> > The 3.0 release will also complete the removal of potentially offensive
> > terms.
> >
> > Work on the evolution of the Accumulo processing model to support dynamic
> > scaling and provide elasticity.  The goal for Accumulo is to move from a
> > model
> > where active table metatdata and table data management is hosted in
> active
> > processes to a model that can dynamically scale server components
> > on-demand to
> > provide configurable latency and higher scalability. the community has
> not
> > decided if the redesign will be a 3.1 or a 4.0 release.
> >
> > ## Community Health:
> > Overall community health is good and GitHub activity remains consistent.
> >
> > - The current decline in GitHub activity is due to quiet post-release
> > activity
> >   and work concentrating on a redesign efforts, including activity
> >   occurring on Confluence
> >
> > - Accumulo has transitioned from Jira to GitHub issues. The remaining
> Jira
> >   activity reflects closing obsolete issues.
> >
> > ## Links
> > [1] https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-34340
> >
>

Reply via email to