Looks fine to me, but I'm wondering if we should omit the Fluo portions
from this, in order to avoid spreading the conversation across too many
forums. Maybe just a simple statement like "see Fluo report" and I can
include the details from your summary of the matter on the Fluo report
instead.

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 5:11 PM Ed Coleman <edcole...@apache.org> wrote:

> The Accumulo community decided to draft the Apache community reports on the
> Accumulo dev list – and this is a draft of the January report for review /
> comments. The report is due by Wednesday, April 9th.
>
> The following is cut-n-paste directly from the tool - formatting
> differences should not be reflected in the tool submission.
>
> Ed Coleman
>
> --- report text from reporter tool ---
>
> ## Description:
> The mission of Apache Accumulo is the creation and maintenance of software
> related to a robust, scalable, distributed key/value store with cell-based
> access control and customizable server-side processing.
>
> ## Project Status:
> Current project status: Ongoing with high activity
>
> Issues for the board: Discussion on folding Fluo under the Accumulo PMC.
>
> The question has been raised by an ASF Director about the status of Fluo
> [1].
>
> Fluo is a distinct and separate project that builds on Accumulo.  The
> Accumulo
> and Fluo PMCs need to start a public discussion on how the Accumulo PMC can
> take ownership of the Fluo code base and if Fluo is maintained as a
> separate
> repo, keeping the current Fluo branding or somehow made a sub-project of
> Accumulo. Keeping the Fluo branding and repo may be the preferred approach,
> but may require additional guidance and coordination with the Board.
>
> ## Membership Data:
> Apache Accumulo was founded 2012-03-20 (13 years ago)
> There are currently 43 committers and 39 PMC members in this project.
> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 6:5.
>
> Community changes, past quarter:
> - No new PMC members. Last addition was Kevin Rathbun on 2024-07-24.
> - No new committers. Last addition was Kevin Rathbun on 2024-07-24.
>
> ## Project Activity:
>
> ### Releases:
> - accumulo-1.10.4 (legacy) was released on 2023-11-16.
> - accumulo-2.1.3 (LTM) was released on 2024-08-12.
> - accumulo-3.0.0 was released on 2023-08-21.
> - accumulo-access-1.0.0-beta was released on 2024-02-17.
>
> ### Planned Release Activity:
>
> Release planning for 2.1.4, 3.1 and 4.0 has been started on the dev list
> [2].
> The release work for 2.1.4 is under way. The 3.1 branch has being prepared
> for
> release with the deprecations required by semver to mark removals that are
> planned to occur in the 4.0 release.
>
> The upcoming 4.0 release will be a significant change to Accumulo and is an
> evolution of the processing model to support dynamic scaling and provide
> elasticity for improved cost and performance management.
>
> ## Community Health:
> Overall community health is good and GitHub activity remains consistent.
> The
> email traffic reflects the community preference of using GitHub projects
> and
> issues for PRs discussions. We also use our slack channel for day-to-day
> communications. We continue to use the mailing list for official Apache
> business and it remains a channel for users to contact us.
>
> ## Links
> <private>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/dcf5b1ypb6ynlklkrfs7r6dbmg9wqsoh
> </private>
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ktpj3165v99gsw8s8lr5qh35r230mkym
>

Reply via email to