Hi Accumulo Devs,

I'd like to propose that INFRA perform some maintenance on some of our repos:

* Rename accumulo-fluo-uno and accumulo-fluo-muchos to drop the
'fluo-' portion of the names; these lead to confusion (on numerous
occasions I've seen people incorrectly refer to "Uno" as "Fluo") and
these are not exclusively tied to Fluo
* Archive accumulo-muchos (after the aforementioned rename); Terraform
templates and similar tools provide the same testing capabilities in a
more standard way
* Rename accumulo-fluo-bytes to accumulo-bytes; this is a project I
started under Fluo to create a new stable API for immutable bytes that
could be used by Fluo and by Accumulo that I'd like to resume work on,
and it doesn't make sense to have Fluo be part of the name since it's
not exclusively for Fluo
* Archive accumulo-bsp, accumulo-instamo-archetype, accumulo-pig, and
accumulo-wikisearch; these side projects have not been actively
maintained, and do not appear to have a high degree of utility for the
Accumulo project at this time, so it does not make sense to get
security alerts or other bug reports regarding them; we can request
that INFRA unarchive them if they become useful to maintain at any
point in the future.

Please let me know what you think. If this makes sense and there are
no objections, I intend to submit an INFRA ticket to complete these
tasks.

Kind regards,
Christopher

Reply via email to