Hi Marcel, About https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-300; we might want to consider getting rid of this code entirely. I implemented it when we planned using the ACE log to centrally collect logs from targets. We ended up solving this problem entirely different as you know, and because of that, I don't really have a use case for the Mongo based implementation any more. If no one else needs it we are probably better of just getting rid of it.
Cheers, Paul On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Marcel Offermans < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello Christian, that is just fine, thanks! > > On 4 Nov 2013, at 15:58 , <[email protected]> < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Marcel, > > > > > > yes I just wanted to confirm Bram's comment earlier that it is working. > Can do it this week if you don't mind? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Christian > > > > > > Marcel Offermans schrieb am 04.11.2013: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I have been going through our backlog, cleaning up some issues that have > >> either been resolved or became invalid based on the latest codebase. > >> > >> I have some questions: > >> > >> @jb You still have some very old issues on your name regarding (mostly) > >> support for Karaf [1] which I did not want to close without consulting > with > >> you first. Do you still plan on working on those in the future? Can you > take > >> a look at them and update them? > >> > >> @paul There is one issue on your name [2], could you take a look at that > >> too? > >> > >> @christian.vogel You mentioned wanting to take a look at [3]? > >> > >> There are still a few issues on my name as well, I will have to take a > >> closer look and will deal with them this week. > >> > >> Greetings, Marcel > >> > >> > >> [1] > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=assignee%20%3D%20jbonofre%20AND%20resolution%20is%20EMPTY%20AND%20project%20%3D%20%22ACE%22 > >> > >> [2]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-300 > >> > >> [3]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-301 > >> > >> > >
