Agreed, I think this might get a bit over complicated considering where we are at the moment.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram > Chirino > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 8:46 PM > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: mini sites for NMS and CMS projects > Importance: High > > yeah it might get a little overly complicated to split things out. > Perhaps this is something we should worry about once more > implementations start cropping up? > > On 2/19/07, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we separate out the cms code from activemq-cpp, how would we go about > > managing the dependency between activemq-cpp and cms? As it stands > right > > now, the user just has to download a single archive that has all the > code > > (apart from standard packages like cppunit). If we break it out, will > the > > user have to download and install cms before downloading and installing > > activemq-cpp? > > > > Maybe there's a way that we can have automake checkout and build cms > > automatically when building activemq-cpp? > > > > On 2/19/07, Mittler, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The APIs should definitely be implementation agnostic. > > > > > > The activemq-cpp implementation of CMS for Stomp, however, uses the > > > ActiveMQ extensions, so it won't work with just any old stomp broker. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:55 PM > > > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: mini sites for NMS and CMS projects > > > > > > > > On 2/19/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Great point. So should we try to keep these CMS/NMS spaces > > > > > implementation agnostic? > > > > > > > > Yeah. e.g. NMS can (just about) talk to any pure Stomp > > > > broker, ditto the CMS as well. So we should definitely try to > > > > make NMS and CMS talk to any broker. > > > > -- > > > > > > > > James > > > > ------- > > > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
