Hello all
Thanks for the feedback. The mistake was on my end.
I was creating two consumers on the same Stomp connection, the first with
noLocal=false and the second with noLocal=true. Because I was using Stomp,
only the first consumer's settings have any effect (same thing as with
selectors).
When I changed my code to only create one consumer with noLocal=true, things
worked as expected, i.e., my consumer didn't receive message sent by the
producer on the same connection.
Cheers,
Albert
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: Consumers, noLocal, Stomp and Openwire
Technically, the no local option is supported on the STOMP subscribe
frame so I'm not sure why it's not supported by the c++ client.
On 5/31/07, Albert Strasheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
Does anybody have any thoughts on this? I'd like to get a final answer
so that I can write the tests for my Python wrapper for AMQCPP
accordingly.
