[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_39399 ]
James Strachan commented on AMQ-1016: ------------------------------------- Hey Endre I think we're all on the same page; we all want to see an end to all these spring XML related bugs, issues and discussions :) I think I'm getting to the bottom of understanding this; apart from the various bugs mentioned above that are now resolved, I think a misunderstanding of the role of the spring.schemas file has caused some confusion & blind alleys. To be fair quite a few folks dived in and tried to fix the various issues in this whole Spring XML namespaces thing; it turned out there was quite a few things going wrong etc. I think we're getting closer now. trunk has a test case Spring2XmlNamespacesTest which uses this spring-embedded-xbean.xml which at the time of writing looks like this... {code} <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://activemq.org/config/1.0 http://activemq.apache.org/snapshot-schema/activemq-core-5.0-SNAPSHOT.xsd"> {code} which works fine. Then there's Spring2XmlNamespacesWithoutRemoteSchemaTest which uses spring-embedded-xbean-noversion.xml which uses an XSD location that doesn't actually exist (rather like in spring using http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans.xsd without using the 2.0 version) {code} <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd http://activemq.org/config/1.0 http://activemq.apache.org/schema/activemq-core.xsd"> {code} this test case works too - showing that the spring.schemas is indeed finding the local activemq.xsd file. > 4.1 RC1: META-INF/spring.schemas refers to building user > "file:/Users/chirino/" > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-1016 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1016 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.1.0 > Environment: n/a > Reporter: Endre Stølsvik > Assignee: Adrian Co > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 5.0.0 > > > Referring to the 4.1 RC1 posted by Hiram Chirino Oct 06, here: > http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-4.1-RC-1-tf2397970.html#a6686974 > The META-INF file spring.schemas have the single line. > "http\://activemq.org/config/1.0=file:/Users/chirino/sandbox/activemq-4.1/activemq-core/target/activemq.xsd" > Notice "file:/" and "Users/chirino". Referring to > org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.PluggableSchemaResolver's javadoc: > "schema-location should also be a schema file in the classpath", and that > no-one can tell what structure I will have on my fs, this must be wrong. In > addition, I most probably won't have a user name "chirino". > PS: In addition, the doc at > > http://www.activemq.org/site/how-do-i-embed-a-broker-inside-a-connection.html > refers as such: > xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0" > .. and .. > xsi:schemaLocation="http://activemq.org/config/1.0 > http://people.apache.org/repository/org.apache.activemq/xsds/activemq-core-4.1-incubator-SNAPSHOT.xsd" > Wouldn't it be nice if this was put at a better place than such a > snapshot-build URI? It could be put where it will reside when 4.1 actually is > out, w/o anyone being to angry about changes during the finalization period, > I personally believe. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.