Hey I just did a little more hacking and if you add this to you maven command line: "-P release" then it will download the camel website and include it in the binary distros under /doc/website
Not sure if we should use this for the 1.0 release since I'm not sure if there would LICENSE issues to worry about by including website content which is wiki driven. Perhaps we should start including the AL 2.0 copyright headers on the wiki pages so that contributors know that any contributions would be under that LICENSE. Thoughts? Regards, Hiram On 6/13/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW I've hacked the distro a bit to include the examples in the binary (along with a few readme files). For now the examples are using the maven build; at some point we could include a little Ant script to allow folks to run the examples using the jars included in the distro. More important going forward is the need for more examples :) On 6/13/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/12/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thew up the http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+1.0+Release > > wiki page for the release. Feel free to update it with more info > > about the release. > > > > Also, I've just committed a fix where some -test.jar did not have a > > License or Notice file in them. This will make it into RC 2. > > I've tidied up a bunch more license headers etc. Also have moved the > eclipse IDE into a separate area that we can release separately, or > move back, when its ready. (Its still kinda experimental). > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/ide/ > > So we're looking much better from the RAT perspective > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
