Yeah! Protocol Buffers is purely a marshalling mechanism only 2008/7/8 Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 - we need to update the on-the-wire format anyways (version 6) - and the > more protocols the better - as long as they are wire format only and do not > dictate how the broker must be implemented ;) > > On 8 Jul 2008, at 08:48, James Strachan wrote: > >> It might not be quite as fast as OpenWire (though should beat STOMP) >> but I wonder if it might be interesting creating a Protocol Buffer >> transport; using the current OpenWire beans as input to generate the >> .proto file for Protocol Buffer... >> >> http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/overview.html >> >> there's currently generated Java, C++ and Python code - and they do >> seem quite good at interop across message versions etc (as its kinda >> key-value pairs under the covers). >> >> I've raised a JIRA for this >> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1843 >> -- >> James >> ------- >> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ >> >> Open Source Integration >> http://open.iona.com > >
-- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com
