Hi, I was just following this thread and even though I am not a committer I thought it would be OK if I put it my 2 cents... Don't you think that moving the old noun-based DSL to a different package than the current one would defeat the purpose of backward-compatibility? If this was done, I believe that all current code would still need to be changed to reference the newly package that contains the old DSL, therefore disarming the backward-compatibility of this solution...
Am I right? 2008/11/21 Hadrian Zbarcea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Interesting idea, but in that case, I'd rather put the old ones in a > separate package. Or put both dsls in separate jars (and use one or the > other). > > > On Nov 21, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > >> I'm not sure how backward compatible we want to remain. It could be >> possible to put the new java DSL route builders in a new package or >> class so that it is possible to one day provide a backward >> compatibility support. Not that we have to do that day 1 of the 2.0 >> release.. >> >> What do you think? >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Jon Anstey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Agreed. We shouldn't even be thinking of keeping two sets of DSL methods >>> for >>> the 2.0 release, would be too messy. I'd say go for it! >>> >>> BTW we've been keeping track of API breaks in the 2.0.0 release notes >>> just >>> so users are aware of this >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+2.0.0+Release >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Willem Jiang >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> In the CAMEL-64[1], we are talking about using the verbs for EIP >>>> actions. >>>> Current Camel's DSL and Spring configruation file are using noun to >>>> define the routing rules. >>>> >>>> Such as >>>> from(seda:a).throttler(10).to(mock:result); >>>> >>>> <camelContext id="camel" >>>> xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";> >>>> <route> >>>> <from uri="seda:a" /> >>>> <throttler maximumRequestsPerPeriod="3" timePeriodMillis="30000"> >>>> <to uri="mock:result" /> >>>> </throttler> >>>> </route> >>>> </camelContext> >>>> >>>> it will be better if we make DSL like this >>>> from(seda:a).throttle(10).to(mock:result); >>>> >>>> As we discussed in the JIRA, it is impossible to make the Spring schema >>>> support old nuns and new verbs at same time. >>>> >>>> Since we are working on Camel 2.0, it will be painless if we directly >>>> move on to use the verbs instead of still supporting nuns in DSL and >>>> Spring configuration. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts ? >>>> >>>> [1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-64 >>>> >>>> Willem >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Jon >>> >>> http://janstey.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://open.iona.com > >
