On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Timothy Bish<tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:26 -0600, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Timothy Bish<tabish...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:44 -0600, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jim Gomes <e.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > There are 2 outstanding bugs logged against the 1.1 version as of this
>> >> > morning. Once those are resolved a release candidate will be cut.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I'm aware of the two outstanding issues. Could you please provide
>> >> a time estimation for completion of those issues?
>> >>
>> >> Bruce
>> >
>> > It probably shouldn't take more than a week to resolve those two,
>> > AMQNET-150 doesn't seem to actually be .Net client specific as the Java
>> > and CPP both seemed behave the same way when I ported the failing unit
>> > test over. I've been trying to reproduce AMQNET-152 today without much
>> > luck so far, so I'm still not convinced there's a problem there yet.
>>
>> Now that these issues have been resolved, when will the next release
>> of NMS be completed?
>>
>> At SpringSource we're planning a point release of Spring.NET soon and
>> we need to coordinate this with the recent changes in ActiveMQ NMS.
>> Please let me know if there's anything that can be done to help out.
>
> Bruce
>
> We are actually in the process of getting things put together for the
> release, so it shouldn't be long. Jim has tagged the code and is
> putting together the release binaries.
Great, thanks for the update, Tim.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
