And how about activemq-camel-loadtest ?? On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote: > and maybe activemq-repository-builder ? > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac > > Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just wanted to bring that up ... >> +1 >> >> And would add >> >> activemq-camel-loadtest >> and probably activemq-groups (Rob what do you think of this?) >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I noticed that we have some other dormant modules.. I think these also >>> should go into the sandbox. What do you guys think? We could always >>> bring them back in a subsequent release if some demand pops up. Or >>> perhaps spin them off with an independent release cycle. >>> >>> activemq-soaktest >>> activemq-systest >>> activemq-protocol-buffer >>> activemq-book >>> activemq-test-atomikos >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hiram >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Hiram >>> >>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >>> >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com/ >>> >> >> >
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com/
