[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971742#action_12971742
]
Gary Tully commented on AMQ-3077:
---------------------------------
not sure on the first part, the first level restriction, I think that should be
configurable because it is topology dependent.
great, patches with tests are always most welcome. There are a few update
rebalance feature tests in activemq-core that will protect that feature with
your changes.
> ArraysIndexOutOfBoundsException : -32768 in "BrokerService[xxx] Task" thread
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3077
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3077
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.4.0, 5.4.1
> Environment: Linux, Java 6, Fuse Message Brokers 5.4.0-1 or 5.4.1-1
> Reporter: Eric
>
> Exception in thread "BrokerService[SUP-tterdp31v] Task"
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -32767
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.BooleanStream.writeBoolean(BooleanStream.java:54)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:377)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.tightMarshalNestedObject1(OpenWireFormat.java:397)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalNestedObject1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightMarshalObjectArray1(BaseDataStreamMarshaller.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v6.BrokerInfoMarshaller.tightMarshal1(BrokerInfoMarshaller.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.marshal(OpenWireFormat.java:228)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.oneway(TcpTransport.java:181)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.oneway(InactivityMonitor.java:255)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportFilter.oneway(TransportFilter.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.oneway(WireFormatNegotiator.java:104)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.transport.MutexTransport.oneway(MutexTransport.java:40)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.dispatch(TransportConnection.java:1249)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.processDispatch(TransportConnection.java:810)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.iterate(TransportConnection.java:846)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner.runTask(PooledTaskRunner.java:122)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.PooledTaskRunner$1.run(PooledTaskRunner.java:43)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> Today this exception is not written in ActiveMQ logs but on the standard
> output.
> It seems that happens when network of brokers connections are stopped, but
> I'm not sure at all. (the number of "bridge to ... stopped" seems to be the
> same as the number of Exceptions detected)
> So I need to dig into this problem to be more precise.
> Eric-AWL
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
