[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13133980#comment-13133980
]
Shanth Arockia commented on AMQ-3549:
-------------------------------------
I have unit tests but very much coupled with our code base. Will isolate the
test and will provide you soon.
> PooledConnectionFactory issue together with Spring "best efforts" transaction
> strategy.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3549
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3549
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0
> Reporter: Shanth Arockia
>
> PooledConnectionFactory issue together with Spring "best efforts" transaction
> strategy. Spring 2.0 already supports synchronized local JMS transactions in
> that style.
> For example if we use a Spring JMSTemplate with the spring synchronized local
> JMS transactions. We get into a problem where the session and hence
> connections are getting closed.
> I have narrowed down and found that the implementation of
> org.apache.activemq.pool.ConnectionPool.expiredCheck() is not correct in such
> a usage.
> I have also looked at the latest version of ActiveMQ as well and the
> implementation has some bug fixes but it would still not solve the
> scenario if its used together with the Spring synchronized local JMS
> transactions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
