[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13582563#comment-13582563
 ] 

Gary Tully commented on AMQ-4122:
---------------------------------

@st.h was thinking the latter. Or maybe there is a logging sql driver or 
wrapper. The broker does not provide this, well not the data in prepared 
statements which is the interesting part. For that reason, the logs from the DB 
is best. And the DB is common to all brokers so it should provide the 
interesting overlap etc.
                
> Lease Database Locker failover broken
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-4122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4122
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.7.0
>         Environment: Java 7u9, SUSE 11, Mysql
>            Reporter: st.h
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>             Fix For: 5.8.0
>
>         Attachments: activemq-kyle.xml, activemq.xml, activemq.xml
>
>
> We are using ActiveMQ 5.7.0 together with a mysql database and could not 
> observe correct failover behavior with lease database locker.
> It seems that there is a race condition, which prevents the correct failover 
> procedure.
> We noticed that when starting up two instances, both instance are becoming 
> master.
> We did several test, including the following and could not observe intended 
> functionality:
> - shutdown all instances
> - manipulate database lock that one node has lock and set expiry time in 
> distance future
> - start up both instances. both instances are unable to acquire lock, as the 
> lock hasn't expired, which should be correct behavior.
> - update the expiry time in database, so that the lock is expired.
> - first instance notices expired lock and becomes master
> - when second instance checks for lock, it also updates the database and 
> becomes master.
> To my understanding the second instance should not be able to update the 
> lock, as it is held by the first instance and should not be able to become 
> master.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to