On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins <joshua.watk...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote: This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on > something?
I *think* there were a couple remaining things: 1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements. I submitted a pull request for this today. Hopefully someone can pick it up and get it committed. 2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into Karaf. Basically makes it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi. (AMQ-4833) I spent some time on this today and logged an issue with Maven Central. Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their end. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged for this. Anyway, not something that the ActiveMQ community can do anything about so likely not a holdup anymore. Anyone have anything else? Dan > > > Regards, > Josh > > On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <de...@nighttale.net> wrote: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed. >> >> Regards >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac >> ---------------------- >> Red Hat, Inc. >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >> dbosa...@redhat.com >> Twitter: @dejanb >> Blog: http://sensatic.net >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now. >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Dejan Bosanac >>> ---------------------- >>> Red Hat, Inc. >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>> dbosa...@redhat.com >>> Twitter: @dejanb >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies >>> <rajdav...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ? >>>> >>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi >>>> and >>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix >>>> for >>>> a >>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade >>>> from >>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi >>>> and >>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> -- >>>>> Dejan Bosanac >>>>> ---------------------- >>>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>>>> dbosa...@redhat.com >>>>> Twitter: @dejanb >>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net >>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 >>>> release? >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker >>>> within >>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel. >>>>>> >>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get >>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions >>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter >>>> which >>>> was >>>>>> introduced in later versions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open >>>> Source >>>>>> Integration specialist >>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac >>>> <de...@nighttale.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> All good on my side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac >>>>>>> ---------------------- >>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc. >>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>>>>>> dbosa...@redhat.com >>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb >>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net >>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies >>>> <rajdav...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - >>>>>> presumably >>>>>>>> that won¹t be far away ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the >>>> leveldb >>>>>>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> hchir...@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rob Davies >>>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ >>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc >>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies >>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Rob Davies >>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹ >>>> Red Hat, Inc >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >>>> Twitter: rajdavies >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>> >>>> >>> > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
