+1
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:05 AM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > My vote isn't binding anyway. You guys can (and apparently will) do > whatever you want, since you control the PMC. I was adding my vote > "for the record." You guys trying to hamstring the main distribution > of AMQ so that you can push your console is really uncool and goes > against the spirit of what the ASF is all about. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:56 PM, James Carman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -1, activemq needs to have a console bundled with it and it needs to > >> be part of the default distribution. > >> > > > > This is not a valid reason for -1. The vote has NOTHING to do about > > the distribution. > > Only about creating a new sub project for the web console project to > live. > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Since there seems to be general agreement that the web-console should > >>> be moved to a sub-project, lets put it to a vote and make it official. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Create the activemq-web-console sub-project with the associated > >>> git, wiki, and jira spaces. > >>> [ ] -1 Veto the making it a sub-project > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Hiram Chirino > >>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > >>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > > > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > Red Hat, Inc. > > Email: [email protected] > > Twitter: davsclaus > > Blog: http://davsclaus.com > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen > > Make your Camel applications look hawt, try: http://hawt.io >
