Will do. Looks like we're waiting for the vote on cxf 2.7.10 then. As
soon as artifacts are published I'll release camel and then activemq.
Hadrian
On 02/06/2014 02:50 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Paul Gale <paul.n.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
If release 5.10.0 of ActiveMQ is going to be cut then you might as
well update the bundled Camel from 2.12.1 to 2.12.2, no? According to
the Camel site this dot release contains 145 fixes.
Yes I have logged ticket for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5030
We need to release Camel first and then upgrade AMQ to include the
latest Camel release.
The Camel source code on 2.12 branch is ready for release, so if you
have free cycles then IMHO its better to start with Camel and then
afterwards AMQ.
Thanks,
Paul
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:32 PM, <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
Hi Hadrian,
I have some OSGi related enhancements and fixes to push, but nothing blocker
for the release (the blockers haven been already pushed).
Regards
JB
On 2014-02-05 18:15, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
I have enough cycles to cut a 5.10.0 this week off of the current
trunk as Hiram suggested. Is there any issue/fix I should wait for?
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 02/03/2014 10:41 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I think it's safest to to just call trunk 5.10 now since it is taking
away some functionality. Would be nice to get some RCs going soon
since trunk is stable right now.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
I am still planning to release 5.9.1. We need to figure out if we want
to
cut 5.9.1 off of the current trunk at a stable checkpoint, or branch it
off
5.9.0 and just select the relevant patches. While the feedback on this
list
is not conclusive (and I personally favor the 1st approach) I believe
most
would favor the 2nd approach. Last week there were over 200 patches that
we'd have to look through and backport. The fastest we could get through
this the sooner we'll have the release, I hope before mid Feb.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:31 PM, kal123 wrote:
There were post for cutting 5.9.1 any update on timeline for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-5-9-1-tp4677074.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
