Gary, I agree that we should focus on 5.10 and we are. We should focus on both 
and keep patching our release. I am also not very happy about the 121 issues 
fixed, but that to me means that this should have been a 5.9.2 or 5.9.3. In the 
camel community for instance (which used to be an activemq subproject long 
ago) we started issuing patch releases some 3 years ago and it went very well.
In activemq we used to do the same thing but stopped a while ago.

Thanks for testing this release,
Hadrian


On Thursday 03 April 2014 05:16:34 Gary Tully wrote:
> -0  with 100+ issues I think this warrants a minor release. It should be
> 5.10.0
> 
> On 1 Apr 2014 15:14, "Hadrian Zbarcea" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've cut a release candidate for the 5.9.1 patch release.
> > I have to update JIRA today to determine the exact number of issues
> > resolved
> > and follow up with another email. This patch release is focused on fixes
> > related to leveldb, a security update for the camel dependency and moving
> > back
> > to using the original activemq console
> >
> > Please review the artifacts for this release candidate and cast your vote
> >
> > The list of resolved issues is:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210
> >&amp;version=12326455
> >
> > You can get binary distributions here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1002
> >/org/apache/activemq/apache- activemq/5.9.1/
> >
> > Source archives are here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1002
> >/org/apache/activemq/activemq- parent/5.9.1
> >
> > Maven2 repository is at:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1002
> >/
> >
> > Source tag:
> > https://git-wip-
> > us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/activemq-5.9.1
> >
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.1
> > [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> 

Reply via email to