[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14057830#comment-14057830
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on AMQ-5269:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user dkulp opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/33

    [AMQ-5269] Update NIO based transports to use a Select mechanism

    Update NIO based transports to use a Select mechanism for the accepts 
instead of the blocking select.
    
    Cuts about 10 minutes off the activemq-stomp tests, drops the NIO test 
execution time down to equal to the non-NIO based tests.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/dkulp/activemq AMQ-5269

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/33.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #33
    
----
commit 52ef9745d9bafbeab940ed4937c014be3abc9655
Author: Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Date:   2014-07-10T14:57:44Z

    [AMQ-5269] Update NIO based transports to use a Select mechanism for the 
accepts instead of the blocking select.
    Cuts about 10 minutes off the activemq-stomp tests, drops the NIO test 
execution time down to equal to the non-NIO based tests.

----


> NIO transports using blocking accept calls, very slow shutdown
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-5269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5269
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Transport
>    Affects Versions: 5.10.0
>            Reporter: Daniel Kulp
>            Assignee: Daniel Kulp
>         Attachments: AMQ-5269.patch
>
>
> Currently, all the TCP based transports are using the old blocking style of 
> socket.accept() to accept connections.   This works "OK" except that for 
> sockets that have a channel associated with them, the socket.close() doesn't 
> cause it to return immediately.  It still waits for the SoTimeout which is 
> currently set a 2 seconds.   That can cause 2 second delays for any shutdown 
> which causes long, unnecessary delays, particularly in the tests.
> One possible "fix" is to drop the socket.setSoTimeout(2000) call to something 
> much smaller.   However, that would turn the accept thread into a more "busy 
> wait" scenario which is undesirable.
> A better fix is to change the accepts for the sockets that have a 
> ServerSocketChannel to use the NIO based selectors for the accept operations. 
>   The selector.disable()/selector.close() allows the socket and everything to 
> close immediately.  The result is that the NIO based tests now take the same 
> amount of time as the non-NIO based tests (for which socket.close() causes 
> the accept to return immediately).
> Pull request forthcoming.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to