That's what I'm getting from Hadrian and Art. I'm 100% sure that's not what they intend. I hope they can restate their concerns in a way that I can understand and that makes it clear that's not what they meant. One thing that would really help me would be to say what they do want rather than what they don't want.
I want activemq to have a clear path to a long term future with a scalable broker, with a community that is working together towards this goal, inclusive, and growing. thanks david jencks On Mar 27, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Tracy Snell <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s more like “Railroading without consensus not welcome here”. No one is > upset that someone is working too hard. Yet another completely ridiculous > assertion. > >> On Mar 27, 2015, at 2:57 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> It certainly makes me feel like "innovation not welcome here" and "if we let >> you in, don't work too hard or we'll get upset" >
