David - please go back and read my posts (user name artnaseef, full name Arthur Naseef). I have repeated myself multiple times with concerns. And there has not been constructive response to my concerns, nor to questions I posed in an attempt to get clarity on the position that ActiveMQ needs a new broker.
It is disappointing because I know there is valid discussion there. I agree this thread contains much passion and input that is unactionable (i.e. pure criticism), and that sucks because it will never serve to move use forward, reach conclusion, nor build consensus. At the same time, it's understandable and I recognize that I have inserted some myself. So let me be the first to apologize. I'm sorry for statements that I've made which have not been constructive. Getting back to the actionable concerns raised and finding a way to address them going forward would be greatly appreciated. If you want me to rehash my concerns, then I'll do so, but I would prefer to avoid repeating myself multiple times. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-HornetQ-ActiveMQ-s-next-generation-tp4693781p4694024.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
