I believe James meant A...

But lets extend it for C) .. both A and B.

for instance: There are tasks that won't necessarily involve coding
that would be nice to have: Like document and test AWS in
clustering... Docker, Kubernetes and a lot of cool stuff that's been
in trends. which would actually be a nice area for contributors...

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote:
> James, is this thread meant to discuss:
>
>   A) the existing features from ActiveMQ 5.x that ActiveMQ {CodeName} would 
> need to implement really be considered the next generation of ActiveMQ
>   B) the features that don't exist today in ActiveMQ that people would like 
> to see in the next generation (i.e. in ActiveMQ {CodeName})
>   C) both 'A' and 'B'
>
> ?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marc Schöchlin" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 2:01:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ {CodeName} Must-Have Features...
>
> Hi,
>
> my whishlist:
> (with descending importance level)
>
> - stability and resilience!!!!!!!
> - simplified configuration, (it should be difficult to create unstable
> configurations)
> - easy and very stable out-of-the-box clustering without centralized
> components
>   (i.e. like leveldb but without running a dedicated zookeeper instance)
> - a very good administration interface which operates on the
> configuration files
> - good operation system packages and integration
>   (RPM, DEB and MSI packages )
> - a good puppet module
>
> Regards
> Marc
>
> Am 15.04.2015 um 17:56 schrieb James Carman:
>> In order for ActiveMQ {CodeName} to take over as the next generation
>> of ActiveMQ, it obviously must have some level of feature parity with
>> the existing ActiveMQ 5.x (or 6.x if it's released before that
>> transition) offering.  We should come up with some level of a roadmap
>> together about which features are required.  Thus far, the only
>> big-ticket items that have been addressed are:
>>
>> 1.  The OpenWire protocol is supported
>> 2.  Auto-creation of destinations (mostly complete).
>>
>> This is obviously not all of what the existing ActiveMQ is all about.
>> What other features are folks wanting to see in the next generation
>> ActiveMQ?
>>
>> James
>
> --
> GPG encryption available: 0x670DCBEC/pool.sks-keyservers.net
> (https://www.256bit.org/keys/mschoechlin.pub.asc)
>



-- 
Clebert Suconic
http://community.jboss.org/people/[email protected]
http://clebertsuconic.blogspot.com

Reply via email to