Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:35, Petter Nordlander <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > I truly love the way the Apollo user interface is made. It¹s awesome and > simple. > > That + some features of ActiveMQ Web Console / Hawt.io that includes > sending and retrying messages would make a great user interface for a > Reactive/Artemis. +10000 Building from what Apollo have is a great idea! > > I would probably be able to help a bit testing and bug fixing of a web > console if such a project is started. > > BR Petter Nordlander > > > Den 2015-04-16 16:06 skrev Clebert <[email protected]>: > >> Just to be clear. Before things diverge again. No one is actually >> considering hawt.io. I took that message as just kidding. >> >> Angular.js seems the best choice from what I have seen. >> >> >> -- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone. >> >>> On Apr 16, 2015, at 08:41, Paul Gale <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If Hawt.io has become/became a single page app (as opposed to the >>> current >>> forward-backward navigation) then >>> it would be worth considering its inclusion; otherwise no. Might as well >>> build some Angular based replacement >>> console SPA from scratch in that case. >>> >>> Just my two cents. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul >>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:59 AM, jgenender <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah... I wouldn't open that can of worms... ;-) >>>> >>>> That said, perhaps at some point in the future hawt.io could be a >>>> donation >>>> to Apache that would likely garner A LOT of support and community >>>> involvement. Imagine the possibilities if that happened! ;-) /me ducks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-ActiveMQ-CodeName-Web-Cons >>>> ole-tp4694984p4695055.html >>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >
