Yeah, we dont need trunk. I must have pushed that by mistake. Will try and remove it. On Apr 24, 2015 8:13 AM, "Robbie Gemmell" <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed from a comment on AMQ-5503 that we seem to have a trunk > branch again: > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/trunk > > There were a few commits on it in March. The first looks to be on > master too, and the others look to be a change and subsequent revert, > so can we simply delete the branch? > > Robbie > > On 10 February 2015 at 04:18, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Done. Please make sure you merge your local trunk to master and continue > to > > work on master. > > > > If you push trunk, there is nothing that prevents the creation of a new > > branch 'trunk' that we'll have to merge and remove again. > > > > Thanks, > > Hadrian > > > > > > > > On 02/08/2015 09:16 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I created the master branch myself. > >> > >> INFRA-9111 is still open. I don't have the karma to remove the 'trunk' > >> branch. Please use 'master' from now on. Let's follow the commits to > trunk > >> and merge them to master, make sure nothing gets lost. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Hadrian > >> > >> > >> On 02/03/2015 04:14 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >>> > >>> Per agreement in this thread, now that 5.11.0 is out, I sent a request > to > >>> infra [1] to rename trunk to master. > >>> Please keep an eye on it so you don't loose work. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Hadrian > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9111 > >>> > >>> > >>> On 01/06/2015 07:58 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Maybe we should wait with the rename until we have 5.11.0 released > >>>> (there’s > >>>> some work involved like reconfiguring jenkins and stuff, so it'll > delay > >>>> release) > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> -- > >>>> Dejan Bosanac > >>>> ---------------------- > >>>> Red Hat, Inc. > >>>> dbosa...@redhat.com > >>>> Twitter: @dejanb > >>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net > >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Robbie Gemmell > >>>> <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 for the rename. > >>>>> > >>>>> Using "master" is typical and this is definitely a change now made by > >>>>> infra during migrations, based on experience of migrating a couple of > >>>>> things into Git repos at Qpid recently. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 5 January 2015 at 18:27, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's a bit confusing, a leftover from the svn days. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think the rename was supposed to happen but it was somehow > >>>>>> overlooked. > >>>>> > >>>>> Any > >>>>>> > >>>>>> objection to rename? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hadrian > >>> > >>> > >> > > >