I didn't mean X.X.0-SNAPSHOT literally...I was just using X as a version placeholder for whatever the current version is. For your version it would still be 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT or 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT, etc.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Will that look ok? > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/330 > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Clebert Suconic > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We can do the same on Artemis.... > > > > So it will be better to make the changes before cleaning up the repo > then. > > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Christopher Shannon > > <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for the version change...I've always used X.X.0-SNAPSHOT and not > >> X.X-SNAPSHOT for development versions so this makes sense to me. > >> > >> I can change the current 5.14-SNAPSHOT to 5.14.0-SNAPSHOT if no one has > any > >> complaints. > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 01/19/2016 04:34 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > >>> > On 18 January 2016 at 18:46, Robbie Gemmell < > robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> On 18 January 2016 at 15:53, Timothy Bish <tabish...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >>> We seem to have a bit of a mess in our snapshots area with lots of > old > >>> >>> snapshots for ancient releases like 5.3, 5.4, etc along with > snapshots > >>> >>> for an ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release that has caused some confusion > recently. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Some examples of old snapshots or snapshot to things that were > never > >>> >>> released. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-aerogear-integration/ > >>> >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-all/ > >>> >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-book/ > >>> >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-bootstrap/ > >>> >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/activemq-core-client/ > >>> >>> > >>> >>> We can request that infra wipe out the snapshots area and let the > >>> >>> jenkins runs repopulate with only the current builds for active > project > >>> >>> work. Alternatively we can go through every folder and audit them > but > >>> >>> given they are snapshots it's simpler just to blow them all away. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Thoughts? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> -- > >>> >>> Tim Bish > >>> >>> twitter: @tabish121 > >>> >>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> Cleaning things up would definitely be good. Given the sizable > amount > >>> >> of cruft I dont think it makes sense to try pruning them > individually, > >>> >> and I'm not sure infra would be particularly happy at being asked > that > >>> >> either hehe, so the full wipe seems like the way to go to me. > >>> >> > >>> >> Robbie > >>> > > >>> > To add to that... > >>> > > >>> > Old snapshots normally get cleaned up once a release occurs but this > >>> > isn't happening for the ActiveMQ 5.X bits, which is why all those old > >>> > bits are still there. The reason is likely that the snapshot versions > >>> > dont align with the end release version used, as the snapshots are > >>> > using 5.X-SNAPSHOT but the released bits then actually use 5.X.0, and > >>> > so the cleanup process isn't able to recognise that the snapshots > have > >>> > become stale artifacts following a release. > >>> > > >>> > We should probably also change to using 5.X.0-SNAPSHOT on master > >>> > (before asking infra to nuke the snapshot repo) to prevent more cruft > >>> > accumulating again with each future release. > >>> > > >>> > Robbie > >>> > > >>> Exactly. Hadn't gotten around to typing that up yet, thanks for saving > >>> me some work Robbie :) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tim Bish > >>> twitter: @tabish121 > >>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/ > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
